- About HHR
By Antonia Chan
The High Court of Kenya has begun reviewing two important cases on the human rights of people living with HIV. The first concerns the forced or coerced sterilization of HIV-positive women; the second challenges a directive from Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta to list the names of HIV-positive individuals, including children. KELIN, an NGO that promotes and advocates for HIV-related human rights in Eastern Africa, has helped spearhead the push for the Kenyan High Court to address these cases, which will be heard on July 29 and August 14, respectively.
The sterilization of HIV-positive Kenyan women without their consent first sparked outrage in 2012, when a report titled “Robbed of Choice” described the experiences of 40 women living with HIV who had been forcibly or coercively sterilized. Five of those women are now suing the Kenyan government for violations of their health and human rights. In a paper published in HHR’s June 2013 issue, Uberoi and de Bruyn noted that some of these women were even asked to sign consent forms for their sterilization while in labor. The authors concluded that punitive and restrictive laws related to pregnancy have numerous adverse consequences—both health-related and socioeconomic—for women, and urged human rights groups to work with government institutions to protect and fulfill women’s fundamental reproductive rights.
President Kenyatta’s directive to collect a list of HIV-positive individuals has also sparked protests that the information will be used for “naming and shaming.” KELIN warned that the directive would “roll back years of work on HIV” by discouraging people from seeking diagnosis and treatment out of concern for their privacy or negative social repercussions. This fear is well-founded: for example, in Mexico, pregnant women living with HIV have reported that after their diagnosis, they were misinformed about available treatments and discriminated against when they sought medical treatment. Forced sterilization without prior consent also occurred in some of these cases.
Protecting patients’ reproductive rights and health-related confidentiality are essential obligations not just for Kenya and Mexico, but for all nations. The Health and Human Rights Journal author Allan Maleche is a human rights lawyer and the Executive Director of KELIN. In the Journal’s December 2014 special issue on health rights litigation, he argued that “strategic litigation can be used to ensure that access to the right to health is realized,” specifically in the context of essential medicines. Now Maleche is helping KELIN and organizations such as UNAIDS take two other health rights issues to court: the reproductive and privacy rights of people living with HIV/AIDS.
More HHR Papers on Reproductive and HIV-Related Rights:
Other Papers by Allan Maleche:
Letter to the Editor: The Rule of Law as a Social Determinant of Health
O.B. K. Dingake
Letter to the Editor: Refusal to Treat Patients Does Not Work in Any Country – Even if Misleadingly Labelled Conscientious Objection
Christian Fiala and Joyce H. Arthur
Letter to the Editor Response: Much to Debate about Conscientious Objection
Wendy Chavkin, Laurel Swerdlow, and Jocelyn Fifield
Papers in Press
The Cholera Epidemic in Zimbabwe, 2008-2009; A Review and Critique of the Evidence
C. Nicholas Cuneo, Richard Sollom, and Chris Beyrer
Letter to the Editor: Human Rights, TB, Legislation and Jurisprudence
O. B. K. Dingake
UNstoppable: How Advocates Persevered in the Fight for Justice for Haitian Cholera Victims
HIV Criminalization Laws and the Right to Health
Canada’s Mining Industry in Guatemala and the Right to Health of Indigenous Peoples